The disciplines and discipline of educational research

Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (2):259–272 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper starts from the point in the early 1970s at which educational theory and research was temporarily structured under the ‘foundation’ disciplines of psychology, sociology, philosophy and history of education. It observes the way the intellectual resources of educational research have become enlarged and enriched and these disciplines themselves fragmented and hybridised to a degree that prompts talk not just of interdisciplinarity but of ‘postdisciplinarity’. The paper argues, however, that without discipline, in the sense of a shared language, a rule governed structure of enquiry—something ‘systematic’—we lose the conditions that make a community of arguers possible. Further, we lose the basis for the special claim which research might otherwise make on our attention and on our belief.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#479,810)

6 months
12 (#237,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Untimely Meditations on the Disciplines of Education.Anne Pirrie & Donald Gillies - 2012 - British Journal of Educational Studies 60 (4):387-402.
Educational Studies and Educational Practice: A Necessary Engagement.Jim Hordern - 2023 - British Journal of Educational Studies 71 (5):567-583.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Human understanding.Stephen Toulmin - 1972 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press.
Philosophy and educational research.John Wilson - 1972 - Windsor,: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales.

View all 12 references / Add more references