Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):204-204 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The story Heidegger tells of the inauguration of western metaphysics in the teleological impulse of Aristotle’s formal cause is by now a familiar one, and the story of how this metaphysics is also one which privileges the modality of vision is equally well known. Yet what is often forgotten is that Aristotle himself, in de Anima, does not privilege vision in the orders of the soul but, to the contrary, identifies touch as the primary, and in fact the only necessary, sense in animals—essential to their being—while the other senses, including sight, contribute only to their “well-being.” While the telos of Plato’s cave is the ascent into the pure light of the Good, the biological vision of Aristotelian animals, including man, is something they only have because they live in air, and must find their food. Thus, the paradoxical nature of the rational animal: the eye that tries to see from outside its skin.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Heavy Light Can Be.Benjamin Wurgaft - 2002 - Film-Philosophy 6 (1).
Struggling to See the Light.Joshua Shaw - 2002 - Film-Philosophy 6 (1).
Painting, sculpture, sight, and touch.Robert Hopkins - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-10

Downloads
2 (#1,801,846)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references