Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for the Development of Sustainable Monitoring Systems for Farm Animal Welfare

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):27-56 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Continued concern for animal welfare may be alleviated when welfare would be monitored on farms. Monitoring can be characterized as an information system where various stakeholders periodically exchange relevant information. Stakeholders include producers, consumers, retailers, the government, scientists, and others. Valuating animal welfare in the animal-product market chain is regarded as a key challenge to further improve the welfare of farm animals and information on the welfare of animals must, therefore, be assessed objectively, for instance, through monitoring. Interviews with Dutch stakeholder representatives were conducted to identify their perceptions about the monitoring of animal welfare. Stakeholder perceptions were characterized in relation to the specific perspectives of each stakeholder. While producers tend to perceive welfare from a production point of view, consumers will use visual images derived from traditional farming and from the animals’ natural environments. Scientists’ perceptions of animal welfare are affected by the need to measure welfare with quantifiable parameters. Retailers and governments (policy makers) have views of welfare that are derived from their relationships with producers, consumers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and scientists. All interviewed stakeholder representatives stated that animal welfare is important. They varied in the extent to which they weighted economic considerations relative to concern for the animals’ welfare. Many stakeholders emphasized the importance of communication in making a monitoring system work. Overall, the perspectives for the development of a sustainable monitoring system that substantially improves farm animal welfare were assessed as being poor in the short term. However, a reliable system could be initiated under certain conditions, such as integrated chains and with influential and motivated stakeholders. A scheme is described with attention points for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare in the long term.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems.Stephanie Yue Cottee & Paul Petersan - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5):501-502.
Farm animal diseases in context.Ben Mepham - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (4-5):331-340.
Mike Appleby. What should we do about animal welfare?Lantz Miller - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (4):457-459.
Recent studies and issues in animal welfare.Anna L. Peterson - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):215-222.
Christian Meyer, animal welfare legislation in canada and germany: A comparison. [REVIEW]Hugh Lehman - 1998 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (2):151-152.
Richard P. Haynes, animal welfare: Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. [REVIEW]David Hoch - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (3):285-290.
Animal Welfare Considerations in Small Ruminant Breeding Specifications.Rodrigue El Balaa & Michel Marie - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):91-102.
Ingrid Leman Stefanovic, safeguarding our common future. Rethinking sustainable development.Susanne Lijmbach - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2):209-217.
Souza filho, hildo M. de, the adoption of sustainable agricultural technologies.I. Howard - 1998 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (2):155-158.
Michael W. Fox, Agricide: The Hidden Farm and Food Crisis That Affects Us All. [REVIEW]Campbell Mora - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (2):200-203.
Animal ethics around the turn of the twenty-first century.D. DeGrazia - 1998 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (2):111-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#295,612)

6 months
14 (#179,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references