Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For?

Research Ethics 5 (1):27-29 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is the first of four papers to be published in Research Ethics Review in 2009 that address methodological issues of relevance to research ethics committees. These will be practical papers, intended to assist ethics committee members to determine whether a research method is both ethically justified and likely to lead to high quality research. This paper prepares the way for the series through a consideration of the relationship between research ethics and methodology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Composition and function of ethical committees.William W. May - 1975 - Journal of Medical Ethics 1 (1):23-29.
Attitudes to research ethical committees.P. Allen & W. E. Waters - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):61-65.
Is Ethical Expertise Possible?Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):127-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
15 (#964,632)

6 months
3 (#1,020,910)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Ethics of vaccine research.Christine Grady - 2005 - In Ana Smith Iltis (ed.), Research Ethics. Routledge.

Add more references