Evaluating Moral Intuitions in Neuroethics: A Neurophenomenological Perspective

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):22-24 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neil Levy (2011) argues that neuroethics as a new discipline distinct from bioethics provides methodological tools to evaluate the validity of our moral intuitions. This naturalistic claim that mor...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):3-9.
Neuroethics: Ethics and the sciences of the mind.Neil Levy - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):69-81.
Disagreements in Moral Intution as Defeaters.Andreas L. Mogensen - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (267):282-302.
Moral intuitions.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Liane Young & Fiery Cushman - 2010 - In John M. Doris (ed.), Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 246--272.
On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
19 (#819,910)

6 months
3 (#1,034,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics”.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):W1-W4.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics.William Frankena - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):74-74.
Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):3-9.
Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character.Talbot Brewer & Robert Audi - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (3):433.

View all 6 references / Add more references