Discussion: Reply to Hitchcock

Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):531-538 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christopher Hitchcocks discussion of my use of screening-off in analyzing the causal process of natural selection raises some interesting issues to which I am pleased to reply. The bulk of his article is devoted to some fairly general points in the theory of explanation. In particular, he questions whether or not my point that phenotype screens off genotype from reproductive success (in cases of organismic selection) supports my claim that the explanation of differential reproductive success should be in terms of phenotypic differences, not genotypic differences. I will respond to this and show why the two supposed counter-examples to my position fail.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review: Hitchcock as philosopher by Yanal, Robert J. [REVIEW]Aaron Smuts - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (3):339–341.
The Phenotype as the Level of Selection: Cave Organisms as Model Systems.Thomas C. Kane, Robert C. Richardson & Daniel W. Fong - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:151-164.
Causality and explanation: A reply to two critiques.Wesley C. Salmon - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (3):461-477.
Screening-off and the units of selection.Elliott Sober - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (1):142-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#311,860)

6 months
11 (#237,138)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Brandon
Duke University

Citations of this work

Evolution.Roberta L. Millstein - 2017 - Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy.
Feminist Philosophy of Science.Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 312–331.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Statistical explanation & statistical relevance.Wesley C. Salmon - 1971 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press. Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey & James G. Greeno.
Four Decades of Scientific Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon & Anne Fagot-Largeault - 1989 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (2):355.
Probabilistic Causality.Ellery Eells - 1991 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Scientific Explanation.P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):85-98.

View all 10 references / Add more references