A Rejection System for the First-Degree Formulae of some Relevant Logics

Australasian Journal of Logic 6:55-69 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard Hilbert-style of axiomatic system yields the assertion of axioms and, via the use of rules, the assertion of theorems. However, there has been little work done on the corresponding axiomatic rejection of non-theorems. Such Hilbert-style rejection would be achieved by the inclusion of certain rejection-axioms (r-axioms) and, by use of rejection-rules (r-rules), the establishment of rejection-theorems (r-theorems). We will call such a proof a rejection-proof (r-proof). The ideal to aim for would be for the theorems and r-theorems to bemutually exclusive and exhaustive. That is, if a formula A is a theorem then it is not an r-theorem, and if A is a non-theorem then it is an r-theorem. In this paper, I present a rejecion system for the first-degree formulae of a large number of relevant logics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Refutation Systems for a System of Nonsense-Logic.Robert Sochacki - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):233-239.
Remarks on Axiomatic Rejection in Aristotle’s Syllogistic.Piotr Kulicki - 2002 - Studies in Logic and Theory of Knowledge 5:231-236.
Rules in relevant logic - I: Semantic classification.Ross T. Brady - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (2):111 - 137.
The Systems of Relevance Logic.Ryszard Mirek - 2011 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 1 (1):87-102.
Deduction theorems for weak implicational logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.
Whither relevant arithmetic?Harvey Friedman & Robert K. Meyer - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):824-831.
Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Negation, Denial, and Rejection.David Ripley - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (9):622-629.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
13 (#1,039,189)

6 months
9 (#312,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Metavaluations.Ross T. Brady - 2017 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):296-323.
What is Wrong with Cantor's Diagonal Argument?R. T. Brady & P. A. Rush - 2008 - Logique Et Analyse 51 (1):185-219..
Four basic logical issues.Ross Brady & Penelope Rush - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):488-508.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reduced models for relevant logics without ${\rm WI}$.John K. Slaney - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (3):395-407.
On the Formalization of the Law of Non-Contradiction.Ross T. Brady - 2004 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction. Clarendon Press.
On the Formalization of the Law of Non-Contradiction.Ross T. Brady - 2006 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press.

Add more references