- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Judging the quality of clinical audit by general practitioners: a pilot study comparing the assessments of medical peers and NHS audit specialists
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (6):1038-1043 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-03
Downloads
24 (#659,625)
6 months
2 (#1,204,205)
2013-11-03
Downloads
24 (#659,625)
6 months
2 (#1,204,205)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction?A. Miles, P. Bentley, A. Polychronis, N. Price & J. Grey - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):29-35.
Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a five‐year study of assessment by peer review.John McKay, Paul Bowie & Murray Lough - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):622-629.
The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review – when is an audit not an audit?Paul Bowie, Sarah Cooke, Penny Lo, John McKay & Murray Lough - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):352-357.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-cc9fg uwo