Why the CLASH model is an unconvincing evolutionary theory of crime

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The nature of crime.Richard Machalek & Lawrence E. Cohen - 1991 - Human Nature 2 (3):215-233.
The Justice of Crime Prevention.Thaddeus Metz - 2004 - Theoria 51 (105):104-128.
Evolutionary synthesis: A search for the strategy.Juha Tuomi - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):429-438.
The Catholic Church and Evolutionary Theory : A Conflict Model.Gereon Wolters - 2009 - In Werner Arber, Nicola Cabibbo & Marcelo Sánchez-Sorondo (eds.), Pontificiae Academiae Acta Vol. 20. Pontifical Academy of Sciences. pp. 450-475.
Neo-Classical Economics and Evolutionary Theory: Strange Bedfellows?Alex Rosenberg - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:174 - 183.
Classical versus evolutionary game theory.Herbert Gintis - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):1-2.
A Simple Theory-Change Model.Rinat M. Nugayev - 1998 - Epistemologia 21 (2):245-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-02

Downloads
14 (#1,011,984)

6 months
14 (#199,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references