Scaffolding the Self in Onlife

In Kathrin Otrel-Cass (ed.), Hyperconnectivity and Digital Reality: Towards the Eutopia of Being Human. Springer Verlag. pp. 27-46 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heidegger, Martin and Gaston Bachelard, phenomenological philosophers of dwelling and the notion of Self, claimed that essentially, we have to dwell in order to be able to think. Building the dwelling is synonymous of being Heidegger, Martin perspective, which means that constructing a shelter for our vulnerable bodies is a prerogative for fulfilling our potentials as humans. These constructs are physical materialisations of our experiences and knowledge of how it is to be a body and closely connected to the way we are in the world. It is being-in-the-world. These are constructions, frameworks, or scaffolds that uphold and withhold, on an existential level, identity, and selfhood. Without these scaffolds, we are left to the dangers and atrocities of life. The general opinion Heidegger, Martin is that Modernity has been systematically constructing cages, caves, and boxes that alienate and distance man from his true being. Technology has separated man from himself and made the opposite of true Scaffolding, and hence from supporting man in his life. This chapter discusses the notions of Scaffolding and enframing in relation to construction of identity and selfhood in virtual reality, as well as reflection on the possibilities of meaningful and responsible Onlife existence. Scaffolding is, as every scaffold-builder would know, an impossible individual enterprise. Actually, Scaffolding has been seen as the ultimate metaphor for the collective and social endeavour, where the construction of the medieval cathedral has become iconic. Scaffolding in the Onlife reality, or making “digital Assemblage”, should be seen as actions of Self-determination together with others, which means that the possible outcomes of scaffolds are both results of what the scaffold withholds, contains, and conceals, and the processes of Co-construction, co-creation, co-shaping, and Co-constitution with others in the Scaffolding. The scaffold mediates this dynamic and fluctuating reality in between selves, others, and technologies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paintings as Solid Affective Scaffolds.Jussi Antti Saarinen - 2019 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 77 (1):67-77.
Music as Affective Scaffolding.Joel Krueger - forthcoming - In David Clarke, Ruth Herbert & Eric Clarke (eds.), Music and Consciousness II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evaluating Hidden Costs of Technological Change.Joseph D. Martin - 2015 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 19 (1):1-25.
Technology In Between the Individual and the Political.Lars Botin, Bas de Boer & Tom Børsen - 2020 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 24 (1-2):1-14.
Developmental Scaffolding.Franco Giorgi & Luis E. Bruni - 2015 - Biosemiotics 8 (2):173-189.
What can the concept of affective scaffolding do for us?Jussi A. Saarinen - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (6):820-839.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
2 (#1,809,554)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references