Russellian Physicalists get our phenomenal concepts wrong

Philosophical Studies 180 (7):1829-1848 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Russellian physicalism is becoming increasingly popular because it promises to deliver what everybody wants, realism and physicalism about consciousness. But Russellian physicalists are not the first to swear on “the promise”, standard Type-B physicalism is a less fanciful view that also claims to give everything and take nothing. In this paper, I argue that our hopes should not be placed on Russellian physicalism because, unlike Type-B physicalism, it cannot explain how phenomenal concepts can reveal the nature of phenomenal properties without weakening its physicalist credentials. The revelation challenge shows that Russellian physicalism is either committed to an anti-realist and self-defeating view of phenomenal concepts or it is physically unacceptable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

There are no phenomenal concepts.Derek Ball - 2009 - Mind 118 (472):935-962.
Do phenomenal concepts misrepresent?Darragh Byrne - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (5):669-678.
Corrigendum: Two Concepts of Psychologism.[author unknown] - 1972 - Philosophical Studies 23 (4):292-292.
Russellianism and the Quotational Model of Phenomenal Concepts.Emmett L. Holman - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40:41-61.
A posteriori physicalists get our phenomenal concepts wrong.Philip Goff - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):191 - 209.
Précis of Doing without Concepts.Edouard Machery - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (3):401-410.
Corrigendum: On the Impossibility of Any Future Metaphysics.[author unknown] - 1961 - Philosophical Studies 12 (3):48-48.
On the Deferential Use of Phenomenal Concepts.Julia Telles de Menezes - 2016 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72 (2-3):573-596.
On Sturgeon’s “The rational Mind”. [REVIEW]Juan Comesaña - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (10):3205-3213.
Correction: Ordinary Language and Absolute Certainty.[author unknown] - 1950 - Philosophical Studies 1 (3):48-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-20

Downloads
100 (#173,893)

6 months
36 (#100,202)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcelino Botin
Universitat de Barcelona

References found in this work

The Meta-Problem of Consciousness.David Chalmers - 2018 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 25 (9-10):6-61.
Thinking about Consciousness.David Papineau - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):333-335.

View all 38 references / Add more references