Special advocacy: political expediency and legal roles in modern judicial systems

Legal Ethics 9 (1):101-124 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modern legal theory and judicial impartiality.Ofer Raban - 2003 - Portland, Or.: GlassHouse Press.
Legal ethics: a comparative study.Geoffrey C. Hazard - 2004 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Angelo Dondi.
Limits of legality: the ethics of lawless judging.Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (ed.) - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Intracultural Awareness in Legal Language—Silvio Berlusconi’s Iconography of Law.Massimo Leone - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (3):579-595.
Help from Hume reconciling professionalism and managed care.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):396 – 410.
The quietus of political interest.Paul J. Griffiths - 2009 - Common Knowledge 15 (1):7-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-06

Downloads
10 (#1,199,114)

6 months
3 (#984,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations