The united states supreme court and the principles of comity: Evidence in transnational litigation

, &
In Andrea Bonomi, Paul Volken & Petar Sarcevic (eds.), Yearbook of Private International Law: Volume Viii. Sellier de Gruyter (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9783866537194.1.53

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The many Mendelsohn 'me too' missteps: An alliterative response to professor Rubinstein.Paul M. Secunda - manuscript
Comity and parallel foreign proceedings: A reply to Black and Swan.Austen Parrish - unknown
The United States Supreme Court and the Privatization of Religion.Richard S. Myers - 2001 - Catholic Social Science Review 6:223-236.
Latvia. Two 2005 latvian supreme court decisions on international jurisdiction and procedure.Andrea Bonomi, Paul Volken & Petar Sarcevic - 2009 - In Andrea Bonomi, Paul Volken & Petar Sarcevic (eds.), Yearbook of Private International Law: Volume Viii. Sellier de Gruyter.
Strate V. a-1 contractors: Intrusion into the sovereign domain of native nations.Angelique EagleWoman - manuscript
China. Enforcement of arbitration clauses: Remarks on two may 10, 2005 decisions of the supreme people’s court of china.Andrea Bonomi, Paul Volken & Petar Sarcevic - 2009 - In Andrea Bonomi, Paul Volken & Petar Sarcevic (eds.), Yearbook of Private International Law: Volume Viii. Sellier de Gruyter.
The Psychology of the Supreme Court.Lawrence S. Wrightsman - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Confirmation bias in the united states supreme court judicial database.Anna Harvey & Michael J. Woodruff - unknown
The Us Supreme Court and the Modern Common Law Approach.Simona Grossi - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
Horizontal and vertical equity in taxation as constitutional principles: Germany and the united states contrasted.Henry Ordower - unknown
An empirical analysis of supreme court certiorari petition procedures: The call for response and the call for the views of the solicitor general.David C. Thompson & Melanie Wachtell - unknown
The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability.Theodore W. Ruger - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability.Theodore W. Ruger - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
Raising the bar: Elite advocacy in supreme court public interest litigation.Reid Krell - unknown
The Rehnquist Legacy.Craig Bradley (ed.) - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
12 (#1,111,684)

6 months
5 (#707,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references