Hinges, Prejudices, and Radical Doubters

Wittgenstein-Studien 10 (1):165-181 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper makes use of the Wittgenstein-inspired perspective of hinge epistemology in connection with research on epistemic injustice. Its aim is to shed light on the neglected relationship between hinges and prejudices, by focusing on the role of the “radical doubter” in epistemic practices.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgensteinian Epistemology and Cartesian Skepticism.Nicola Claudio Salvatore - 2015 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):53-80.
Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront a Legend.Nancy Easterlin - 1999 - Philosophy and Literature 23 (1):217-220.
Magicians, doubters and perverts: on doubting the clear and distinct.Gjd Moyal - 1996 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50 (195):73-107.
Implicit attitudes and implicit prejudices.René Baston & Gottfried Vosgerau - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):889-903.
Rational Attack on Shulamith Firestone’s Radical Feminism.Ma Theresa T. Payongayong & Jeanette L. Yasol-Naval - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 25:77-85.
Miracles, Hinges, and Grammar in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty.Luigi Perissinotto - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (2-3):143-164.
Moral prejudices: essays on ethics.Annette Baier - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-17

Downloads
70 (#234,538)

6 months
10 (#272,213)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anna Boncompagni
University of California, Irvine

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references