Why to buy your Darling flowers: On cooperation and exploitation

Theory and Decision 50 (1):1--28 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Trusting in someone's cooperation is often connected with the danger of being exploited. So it is important that signals are exchanged which make it probable enough that the potential partner is reliable. Such signals must be too expensive for partners who are planning to abuse the trust they are given but cheap enough for those who wish to initiate a long-term cooperation. In a game theoretical model, it is shown that such signals could consist of presents given before the partnership starts. (edited).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sharing out in alliances: Trust and ethics. [REVIEW]Antonio Argandoña - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3):217 - 228.
The other cooperation problem: Generating benefit.Brett Calcott - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):179-203.
The ethics of listening: Namibian perspectives on academic cooperation in a globalized world.Christo Lombard - 1999 - [Windhoek]: Ecumenical Institute for Namibia, University of Namibia.
Why not go all the way.Richard Schuster - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):173-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-01

Downloads
77 (#219,284)

6 months
1 (#1,501,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations