Making sense of language in the light of evolution

Mind and Language 32 (5):591-596 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inquiry into language evolution has been controversial, mainly because there is no consensus as to the nature of both ‘evolution’ and ‘language.’ Berwick and Chomsky make sense of the evolution of language by treating it as a biological phenomenon. In contrast to functional characterizations of language as ‘communication’ or ‘speech,’ the authors define it as, essentially, a mind-internal computational mechanism. Within their minimalist approach, hierarchical syntactic structure is achieved through the recursive application of a basic operation called ‘Merge.’ The simplicity of the basic operation is consistent with archeological evidence suggesting an evolutionary recent origin of language.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The evolution of syntactic structure. [REVIEW]Richard Moore - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (4):599-613.
The emergence of language.Mark Steedman - 2017 - Mind and Language 32 (5):579-590.
Language evolution without evolution.Derek Bickerton - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):669-670.
Modeling Co‐evolution of Speech and Biology.Bart Boer - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (2):459-468.
Different Kinds of Evolution.J. Arthur Thomson - 1926 - Philosophy 1 (1):50-54.
Language evolution in apes and autonomous agents.Angelo Cangelosi - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):622-623.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-14

Downloads
35 (#456,100)

6 months
6 (#518,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references