Marxism and Intersectionality: Race, Gender, Class and Sexuality Under Contemporary Capitalism

Transcript Verlag (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ashley J. Bohrer argues that it is only by considering race, gender, sexuality, and ability within the structures of capitalism and imperialism that we can understand power relations. Bohrer explains how the purported incompatibilities between Marxism and intersectionality arise more from miscommunication than a fundamental conceptual antagonism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The metaphysics of intersectionality.Sara Bernstein - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (2):321-335.
The race for class: Reflections on a critical raceclass theory of education.Zeus Leonardo - 2012 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 48 (5):427-449.
Reinvigorating Intersectionality as a Provisional Concept.Anna Carastathis - 2014 - In Namita Goswami, Maeve O'Donovan & Lisa Yount (eds.), Why Race and Gender Still Matter: An Intersectional Approach. Pickering & Chatto. pp. 59-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-31

Downloads
45 (#354,374)

6 months
12 (#216,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ashley Bohrer
Hamilton College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references