The Evolutionary Economics of Science

Spontaneous Generations 7 (1):62-68 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This short paper is about the generalized evolutionary approach to the economics of science. Stephen Toulmin and David Hull are pioneers of the former rather than Karl Popper whose falsification thesis was sociologically naive. Useful directions for the future would go beyond the generalities of variation, transmission and selection towards making more explicit use of Darwin’s “two great principles.” The first is “the unity of types” i.e. common descent by employing phylogenetic methods to answer historical questions. The second is “the conditions of existence” i.e. natural selection by making use of general principles of evolutionary ecology and socioecology to answer questions about why something evolved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neo-Classical Economics and Evolutionary Theory: Strange Bedfellows?Alex Rosenberg - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:174 - 183.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
Against Evolutionary Epistemology.Paul Thagard - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:187 - 196.
Models of man: Neoclassical, behavioural, and evolutionary.Dennis C. Mueller - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):59-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-26

Downloads
40 (#395,464)

6 months
9 (#300,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?