Authors’ Response: Professional Development and Policymaking in Maker Education: Old Dilemmas and Familiar Risks

Constructivist Foundations 14 (3):268-271 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Maker education is a new instantiation of the decades-old project of project-based, constructionist, inquiry-driven learning. However, unlike other past implementations, it offers many unique characteristics, makes possible novel educational outcomes, and challenges policy makers and teachers with new infrastructural needs. In this response, using examples from school and district-wide implementation, we address three categories of questions raised in the commentaries around maker education: the uniqueness of makerspaces and the artifacts produced within them, teacher professional development for this novel type of school environment, and new approaches to assessment. Our conclusions point to recommendations that could be useful for policy makers, teachers and educators working on the implementation of maker programs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Roles of Teachers in Makerspace Learning.Arthur Hjorth - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 14 (3):263-264.
Educational reform: a Deweyan perspective.Douglas J. Simpson - 1997 - New York: Garland. Edited by Michael J. B. Jackson.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
1 (#1,910,137)

6 months
1 (#1,508,101)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references