The differentiation argument: If newborns outrank animals, so do fetuses

Bioethics 35 (2):207-213 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Common‐sense morality seems to dictate that newborn babies strictly outrank non‐human animals on an ordered list of subjects of moral consideration. This is best described as the view that newborn babies have a higher moral status than any non‐human animal. In this article, I will argue that this common‐sense claim about the special moral status of newborn babies makes it hard to avoid the conclusion that fetuses, including pre‐conscious fetuses, also have a higher moral status than any non‐human animal—indeed, as high as newborn babies. While this conclusion does not quite entail that abortion is generally seriously immoral, it does seem to follow that it would be no less difficult to justify (even relatively early) abortion than it would be to justify killing a newborn.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Killing fetuses and killing newborns.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):19-20.
Fetuses, Newborns, and Parental Responsibility.Prabhpal Singh - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (3):188-193.
Slaves, Fetuses, and Animals.William David Hart - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (4):661-690.
Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63.
Schrödinger’s Fetus.Joona Räsänen - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):125-130.
Infants, animals, and the origins of number.Eric Margolis - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
The parenthood argument.William Simkulet - 2017 - Bioethics 32 (1):10-15.
Abortion, infanticide and moral context.Lindsey Porter - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):350-352.
On an inconsistency in Thomson's abortion argument.Roger F. Gibson - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 46 (1):131 - 139.
Defending the Distinction Between Pregnancy and Parenthood.Prabhpal Singh - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):189-191.
Metaphorical Imagination: The Legal and Moral Status of Embryos and Fetuses in Four Common Law Countries.Kayhan Pake Parsi - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-25

Downloads
45 (#354,073)

6 months
11 (#239,725)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kyle Blanchette
Western Michigan University

References found in this work

Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Virtue Theory and Abortion.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (3):223-246.
A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references