It is morally permissible to manipulate the genome of domestic hogs

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):166-176 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01980313

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Nonworseness Claim and the Moral Permissibility of Better-Than-Permissible Acts.Adam D. Bailey - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (2):237-250.
Better Not to Have Children.Gerald K. Harrison & Julia Tanner - 2011 - Think, 10(27), 113-121 (27):113-121.
On Not Being Sorry About The Morally Bad.Saul Smilansky - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (2):261-265.
Kant's normative ethics.Brad Hooker - unknown
Theodicy, Our Well-Being, and God's Rights.Richard Swinburne - 1995 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38 (1-3):75 - 91.
We should not manipulate the genome of domestic hogs.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):177-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#391,610)

6 months
2 (#1,206,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ethics and the genetic engineering of food animals.Paul B. Thompson - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):1-23.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.David Hume - 1751 - New York,: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp.
On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1859 - Broadview Press.
On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1956 - Cambridge University Press.
An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals.David Hume & Tom L. Beauchamp - 1998 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 190 (2):230-231.

View all 14 references / Add more references