Sophia 34 (1):9-31 (
1995)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
A Jamesian defence of a moderate fideism which holds that acceptance of (religious) belief beyond, though not contrary to, the evidence is morally permissible--though only under quite tight conditions, which, I argue, include the requirement that the "passional basis" for such acceptance must itself be morally admirable. The claim that "suprarational" faith is virtuous thus remains open, even though vindicated against the objection that believing beyond the evidence is always vicious. I also explore the extent to which the proposal that what makes a belief religious is that it can be accepted only by suprarational faith imposes constraints on the possible content of religious belief