- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Publicizing scientific misconduct and its consequences
Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):435-436 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct.Anne Victoria Neale, Rhonda K. Dailey & Judith Abrams - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):251-261.
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Effectiveness of research guidelines in prevention of scientific misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Misconduct in science and the German law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Scientific misconduct: Ongoing developments.Raymond Spier & Stephanie J. Bird - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):3-4.
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? [REVIEW]Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):271-282.
A rhetorical analysis of apologies for scientific misconduct: Do they really mean it?Lawrence Souder - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):175-184.
Scientific misconduct and science ethics: A case study based approach.Luca Consoli - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):533-541.
Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct.Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
45 (#355,034)
6 months
1 (#1,477,342)
2009-01-28
Downloads
45 (#355,034)
6 months
1 (#1,477,342)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases.Péter Kakuk, Soren Holm, János Kristóf Bodnár, Mohammad Hosseini, Jonathan Lewis, Bert Gordijn & Anna Catharina Vieira Armond - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-14.
On identifying research misconduct respondents.Debra M. Parrish - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):171-172.
References found in this work
The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?James S. Lubalin & Jennifer L. Matheson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):229-250.
Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students.Debra M. Parrish - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):483-491.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo