R. (adam, limbuela and tesema) V. secretary of state for the home department: A case of 'mountainish inhumanity'?

Abstract

In this article the authors discuss the decision of the House of Lords in Adam, Limbuela and Tesema, where the judges gave detailed scrutiny to the support duty s.55 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 towards those who are seeking asylum and considered the approach to be adopted in determining whether there was an incompatibility with Art.3 of the European Convention on Human Rights if support was denied.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Private Life and the English Judges.Richard Buxton - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (3):413-425.
EU Immigration and Asylum Law.Steve Peers - 2015 - In Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 519–533.
Women and Asylum: A Particular Social Group. [REVIEW]Sue Kirvan - 1999 - Feminist Legal Studies 7 (3):333-342.
Asylum seekers and human rights.John Edwards - 2001 - Res Publica 7 (2):159-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-07

Downloads
38 (#432,183)

6 months
2 (#1,258,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references