Schelling’s prehistory in Russia: the legacy of enlightenment

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 80 (1-2):90-100 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTSchelling’s first Russian disciple, D.M. Vellanskij, met his teacher at Würzburg in 1803. It was the heyday of Schelling’s philosophy of identity, the identity of spirit and nature, of mind and matter. Yet, teacher and student differ on the labels they applied to this philosophy. Vellanskij thought of it as the peak of human ‘Aufklärung’, whereas Schelling abhorred the term due to controversies going on within German philosophy at the time. The argument put forward here is that Vellanskij was right in using the term ‘Enlightenment’ for Schelling’s philosophy of identity, which conceptualized – via nature – the ideas of free movement, tolerance and human solidarity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpreting Schelling: Critical Essays.Lara Ostaric (ed.) - 2014 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schelling's Theory of Symbolic Language: Forming the System of Identity.Daniel Whistler - 2013 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Schelling’s Real Materialism.Michael Blamauer - 2012 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 16:1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-20

Downloads
15 (#950,030)

6 months
2 (#1,203,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik.Martin Heidegger - 1929 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 8:101-101.
Index.RobertHG Wokler - 2012 - In Rousseau, the Age of Enlightenment, and Their Legacies. Princeton University Press. pp. 375-396.
Notes.RobertHG Wokler - 2012 - In Rousseau, the Age of Enlightenment, and Their Legacies. Princeton University Press. pp. 279-362.

Add more references