Proportionality, Just War Theory, and America’s 2003–2004 War Against Iraq

Social Philosophy Today 21:137-156 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Just war theory requires that a nation at war respect proportionality both before it goes to war, jus ad bellum, and in the way it fights a war, jus in bello. To respect proportionality is to know or estimate on good evidence that the whole war and the tactics used in the war will not generate more evil and harm and costs than they will generate good and help and benefits. This paper argues that the 2003–2004 U.S. war on Iraq fails on both counts. It considers, in regard to jus ad bellum, the evils, harms, and costs that the war forces on the Iraqi military and civilians, the American military, and American and non-Iraqi civilians. It considers, under jus in bello, the evils, harms, and costs that the war forces on Iraqi civilians. On the proportionality standards for a just war, this war is a miserable failure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reparations for U.S. war crimes against Iraq.J. Angelo Corlett - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):193-217.
España, la guerra de Iraq y la lengua española en EEUU.[author unknown] - 2004 - El Catoblepas: Revista Crítica Del Presente.
The constitutional structure of proportionality.Matthias Klatt - 2012 - Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Moritz Meister.
The New Utopianism: Liberalism, American Foreign Policy, and the War in Iraq.Eric A. Heinze - 2008 - Journal of International Political Theory 4 (1):105-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-02

Downloads
41 (#389,432)

6 months
7 (#435,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references