Nieuwentyt's significance for the philosophy of science

Synthese 9 (1):447 - 453 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Engaging Science through Cultural Studies.Joseph Rouse - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:396 - 401.
Genuine Problems and the Significance of Science.Matthew J. Brown - 2010 - Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):131-153.
On the Present State of the Philosophy of Quantum Mathematics.Howard Stein - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:563 - 581.
Why do biologists argue like they do?John Beatty - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):443.
Significance of the experience of the individual for the science of psychology.K. Zener - 1952 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:354-69.
The evidential significance of thought experiment in science.W. J. - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (2):233-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
73 (#227,775)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Curing Pansophia through Eruditum Nescire: Bernard Nieuwentijt’s Epistemology of Modesty.Steffen Ducheyne - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (2):272-301.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references