Some effects of contour on simultaneous brightness contrast

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):251 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0021726

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The role of simultaneous contrast in brightness constancy.H. Leibowitz, Nancy A. Myers & P. Chinetti - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (1):15.
The magnitude of simultaneous color contrast and simultaneous brightness contrast for chimpanzee and man.W. F. Grether - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1):69.
Foveal simultaneous brightness contrast as a function of inducing, and test-field luminances.A. L. Diamond - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):304.
The reversal of simultaneous brightness contrast.S. M. Newhall - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (5):393.
Visual perceptual latency as a function of stimulus brightness and contour shape.Paul G. Cheatham - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (5):369.
A comparison of psychophysical methods in the investigation of foveal simultaneous brightness contrast.A. L. Diamond, H. Scheible, E. Schwartz & R. Young - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (3):171.
Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in human-probability learning.Joseph Halpern, Jeffrey A. Schwartz & Richard Chapman - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):581.
Subjective contour: The inadequacy of brightness contrast as an explanation.Stanley Coren & Leonard H. Theodor - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (1):87-89.
Effects of caffeine on enhancement in foveal simultaneous contrast.J. P. Kleman, A. L. Diamond & Esther Smith - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (1):18.
Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing- and test-field luminances.Eric G. Heinemann - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (2):89.
The effect of separation between test and inducing fields on brightness constancy.Bruce Dunn & H. Leibowitz - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (6):505.
Enhancement and diminution of simultaneous brightness contrast by extended practice.Kendon Smith, Rebecca Craig McNeill & Karen Amick Clark - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (4):271-274.
Configuration and brightness contrast.W. H. Mikesell & M. Bentley - 1930 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 13 (1):1.
Causation as simultaneous and continuous.Michael Huemer & Ben Kovitz - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):556–565.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
18 (#830,660)

6 months
8 (#356,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references