Personal and sub‐personal; A difference without a distinction

Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):63-82 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that, while there is a difference between personal and sub‐personal explanation, claims of autonomy should be treated with scepticism. It distinguishes between horizontal and vertical explanatory relations that might hold between facts at the personal and farts at the sub‐personal level. Noting that many philosophers are prepared to accept vertical explanatory relations between the two levels, I argue for the stronger claim that, in the case of at least three central personal level phenomena, the demands of explanatory adequacy require postulating horizontal explanatory relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The uses and abuses of the personal/subpersonal distinction.Zoe Drayson - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):1-18.
The Personal/Subpersonal Distinction.Zoe Drayson - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (5):338-346.
Constitutive relevance and the personal/subpersonal distinction.Matteo Colombo - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology (ahead-of-print):1–24.
Neural mechanisms of decision-making and the personal level.Nicholas Shea - 2012 - In K. W. M. Fulford (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford University Press. pp. 1063-1082.
Belief and consciousness.Sara Worley - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):41-55.
Minds: Contents without vehicles.Sonia Sedivy - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):149-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-27

Downloads
32 (#504,058)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jose Luis Bermudez
Texas A&M University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references