Germline Gene Editing: The Gender Issues

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (2):186-192 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human germline gene editing constitutes an extremely promising technology; at the same time, however, it raises remarkable ethical, legal, and social issues. Although many of these issues have been largely explored by the academic literature, there are gender issues embedded in the process that have not received the attention they deserve. This paper examines ways in which this new tool necessarily affects males and females differently—both in rewards and perils. The authors conclude that there is an urgent need to include these gender issues in the current debate, before giving a green light to this new technology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who Goes First? Deaf People and CRISPR Germline Editing.Carol Padden & Jacqueline Humphries - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):54-65.
The Duty to Edit the Human Germline.Parker Crutchfield - 2022 - Res Publica 29 (3):347-365.
Public views on gene editing and its uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.
Nurturing or Purifying the Human Genome: Promises and Pitfalls of CRISPR Germline Editing.Evelyne Shuster - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):299-304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-28

Downloads
16 (#930,342)

6 months
4 (#854,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?