Conjunction-based Sorites: A Misguided Objection to Degree-Theoretic Solutions to Sorites Paradoxes

Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (1):1-4 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1987, Crispin Wright argued that degree-theoretic solutions to the Sorites paradox fail because the solutions do not work when the paradox is restated using a conjunctive major premise. I show that Wright is incorrect: degree-theoretic solutions also work when the paradox is stated with a conjunctive major premise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Verities, the sorites, and Theseus’ ship.Igor Douven - 2017 - Synthese 194 (10):3867-3878.
Deconstructing a Topological Sorites.D. Rizza - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (3):361-364.
Inclosures, Vagueness, and Self-Reference.Graham Priest - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1):69-84.
Consonance and Dissonance in Solutions to the Sorites.Nicholas J. J. Smith - forthcoming - In Otavio Bueno & Ali Abasnezhad (eds.), On the Sorites Paradox. Springer.
Degrees of Truth versus Intuitionism.George Rea - 1989 - Analysis 49 (1):31 - 32.
Sorites paradoxes and the transition question.Mark Sainsbury - 1992 - Philosophical Papers 21 (3):177-190.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
A note on the sorites paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):74 – 75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
26 (#614,101)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic.Petr Hájek - 1998 - Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Add more references