- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Affectuum imitatio y point de vue: en torno a la intersubjetividad en Spinoza y Leibniz
Areté. Revista de Filosofía 28 (1):167-189 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Sympathy and affectuum imitatio: Spinoza and Hume as social and political psychologists.Rudmer Bijlsma - 2014 - South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (1):1-18.
Leibniz tras los pasos de Spinoza.Enrico Pasini - 2014 - In Leticia Cabañas & Oscar M. Esquisabel (eds.), Leibniz Frente a Spinoza. Una Interpretación Panorámica. Editorial Comares. pp. 71-95.
Existence, Essence, et Expression: Leibniz sur 'toutes les absurdités du Dieu de Spinoza'.Brandon C. Look - 2014 - In Pierre-Francois Moreau, Mogens Laerke & Raphaële Andrault (eds.), Spinoza et Leibniz: Rencontres, controverse, réceptions. Paris: Presses de l'Université Paris-Sorbonne. pp. 57-82.
Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Laerke - 2011 - Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84.
Why Shouldn’t Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
Why Shouldn’t Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
Leibniz: a collection of critical essays.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1976 - Notre Dame [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
Leibniz alla caccia di Spinoza.Enrico Pasini - 2005 - In Stefano Gensini (ed.), Linguaggio, Mente, Conoscenza. Intorno a Leibniz. Carocci. pp. 59-86.
“Spinoza, Tschirnhaus et Leibniz: Qu’est un monde?“.Yitzhak Melamed - 2014 - In Raphaële Andrault Pierre-François Moreau (ed.), Spinoza et Leibniz. Ecole Normale Superieure Editions. pp. 85-95.
The differential point of view of the infinitesimal calculus in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze.Simon Duffy - 2006 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 37 (3):286-307.
Leibniz on Spinoza's Political Philosophy.Mogens Laerke - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:105-134.
A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8).Ohad Nachtomy - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):935-961.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-08-03
Downloads
8 (#1,336,912)
6 months
2 (#1,243,547)
2016-08-03
Downloads
8 (#1,336,912)
6 months
2 (#1,243,547)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-747975fc64-ttfh4 uwo