The modal gap: The objective problem of Lessing's ditch(es) and Kierkegaard's subjective reply

Religious Studies 42 (1):27-44 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay expands upon the suggestion that Lessing's infamous ‘ditch’ is actually three ditches: temporal, metaphysical, and existential gaps. It examines the complex problems these ditches raise, and then proposes that Kierkegaard's Fragments and Postscript exhibit a similar triadic organizational structure, which may signal a deliberate attempt to engage and respond to Lessing's three gaps. Viewing the Climacean project in this way offers an enhanced understanding of the intricacies of Lessing's rationalist approach to both religion and historical truth, and illuminates Climacus's subjective response to Lessing.

Similar books and articles

Lessing.Claus vBormann - 1982 - In Albert Anderson, Niels Thulstrup & Marie Mikulová Thulstrup (eds.), Kierkegaard's Teachers. C.A. Reitzels Forlag.
Philosophical and theological writings.Gotthold Ephraim Lessing - 2005 - Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by H. B. Nisbet.
Concluding unscientific postscript to Philosophical fragments.Søren Kierkegaard - 1992 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Howard Vincent Hong, Edna Hatlestad Hong & Søren Kierkegaard.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
950 (#14,828)

6 months
143 (#24,785)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew A. Benton
Seattle Pacific University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references