Self-consistent selection of a superconducting representation for the BCS model

Foundations of Physics 8 (9-10):653-666 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taking the BCS Hamiltonian written in second-quantized form, a modified form of Umezawa's self-consistent field theory method is applied, and a unitarily nonequivalent representation is selected in which the Hamiltonian obviously describes a superconducting system. This result is not at all obvious, since the original Hamiltonian is completely symmetric, and there is no reason a priori for expecting it to describe an asymmetric superconducting configuration. All higher order terms are accounted for, and in doing so, one finds the existence of the energy-gap condition for Cooper pairs. The representation is picked out without using the adiabatic theorem or pair approximation, as is typically done in the self-consistent method for superconductivity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Lectures on Color Superconductivity.Igor A. Shovkovy - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (8):1309-1358.
Kripke models for linear logic.Gerard Allwein & J. Michael Dunn - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):514-545.
Random matrices, fermions, collective fields, and universality.B. Sakita - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (11):1519-1525.
Power-like models of set theory.Ali Enayat - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1766-1782.
Implicit and explicit representations of visual space.Bruce Bridgeman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):759-760.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
25 (#638,434)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references