Iffy predictions and proper expectations

Synthese 191 (8):1857-1866 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What individuates the speech act of prediction? The standard view is that prediction is individuated by the fact that it is the unique speech act that requires future-directed content. We argue against this view and two successor views. We then lay out several other potential strategies for individuating prediction, including the sort of view we favor. We suggest that prediction is individuated normatively and has a special connection to the epistemic standards of expectation. In the process, we advocate some constraints that we think a good theory of prediction should respect

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge Guaranteed.John Turri - 2011 - Noûs 47 (3):602-612.
Are generic predictions enough?Alexander Rosenberg - 1989 - Erkenntnis 30 (1-2):43 - 68.
Autonomous agents with norms.Frank Dignum - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (1):69-79.
Is prediction possible in general relativity?John Byron Manchak - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (4):317-321.
Assertion and its constitutive norms.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):98-130.
Reintroducing prediction to explanation.Heather E. Douglas - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (4):444-463.
Reichenbach's concept of prediction.Wenceslao J. González - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):37-58.
A note on prediction and deduction.John Canfield & Keith Lehrer - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (2):204-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
210 (#95,566)

6 months
29 (#107,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

John Turri
University of Waterloo
Matthew A. Benton
Seattle Pacific University

Citations of this work

Assertion is weak.Matthew Mandelkern & Kevin Dorst - 2022 - Philosophers' Imprint 22.
Knowledge First?Aidan McGlynn - 2014 - New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillian.
Hedged Assertion.Matthew A. Benton & Peter Van Elswyk - 2018 - In Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford University Press. pp. 245-263.
Assertion remains strong.Peter van Elswyk & Matthew A. Benton - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (1):27-50.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.

View all 27 references / Add more references