A Legacy of Ethical Atomism

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):193 - 208 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I want to deal in this essay with the group of philosophers that G.E.M. Anscombe includes under the term ‘modern moral philosophy’ in her essay by that name. The stars of this group are Hobbes, Hume, Adam Smith, Mill, Sidgwick, Moore. I mean to include as well generally the last hundred years of emotivists, utilitarians, and those theorists who have emphasized universalizability in its various versions. For reasons which I hope will soon become clear, I will refer to this broad group as the ‘atomistic tradition.’ I will be assuming, though not often saying, that the most forthright and thorough spokesman of the tradition is David Hume who, in his purely skeptical moments, was so atomistic and extensionalist that he even denied personal identity over time. Anything less than that is not purely atomistic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein's logical atomism.Ian Proops - 2004 - Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (65):374-376.
Russell's Logical atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1972 - London,: Fontana. Edited by David Pears & Bertrand Russell.
John Wyclif's atomism.Emily Michael - 2009 - In Christophe Grellard & Aurélien Robert (eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology. Boston: Brill. pp. 9--183.
Russell's logical atomism.David Bostock - 2012 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
William Crathorn's mereotopological atomism.Aurélien Robert - 2009 - In Christophe Grellard & Aurélien Robert (eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology. Boston: Brill. pp. 9--127.
Is conceptual atomism a plausible theory of concepts?Jack M. C. Kwong - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):413-434.
Essay on atomism.Lancelot Law Whyte - 1961 - Middletown, Conn.,: Wesleyan University Press.
Plurals and complexes.Keith Hossack - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):411-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
57 (#279,602)

6 months
15 (#164,019)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references