On the relationship between weak compactness inL ω 1 ω,L ω 1 ω 1, and restricted second-order languages

Archive for Mathematical Logic 15 (1-2):74-78 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Sequentially Compact Subspaces of.Kyriakos Keremedis & Eleftherios Tachtsis - 2003 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (3):175-184.
Compactness and independence in non first order frameworks.Itay Ben-Yaacov - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (1):28-50.
Compactness in first order Łukasiewicz logic.N. Tavana, M. Pourmahdian & F. Didehvar - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (1):254-265.
Infinitary logic.John L. Bell - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Boolean universes above Boolean models.Friedrich Wehrung - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (4):1219-1250.
Gödel functional interpretation and weak compactness.Ulrich Kohlenbach - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1560-1579.
Pigeonhole and Choice Principles.Wolfgang Degen - 2000 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (3):313-334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-03

Downloads
5 (#1,544,856)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John L. Bell
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Infinitary logic.John L. Bell - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references