Ungrounded semantics: Searle’s chinese room thought experiment, the failure of meta-and subsystemic understanding, and some thoughts about thought-experiments

Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 42 (1):75-96 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nixin' goes to china.Larry Hauser - 2003 - In John M. Preston & John Mark Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. pp. 123--143.
Chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Searle's experiments with thought.William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (June):271-9.
A note on the chinese room.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 1993 - Synthese 95 (2):169-72.
Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room.Jason Ford - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):57-72.
The chinese room argument: Consciousness and understanding.Simone Gozzano - 1997 - In Matjaz Gams, M. Paprzycki & X. Wu (eds.), Mind Versus Computer: Were Dreyfus and Winograd Right? Amsterdam: IOS Press. pp. 43--231.
Thought and thought experiments.David Cole - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 45 (May):431-44.
The logic of Searle’s Chinese room argument.Robert I. Damper - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):163-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
13 (#1,036,484)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references