John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience and Nature [Book Review]

Idealistic Studies 22 (3):220-221 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alexander’s book has what may at first appera to be the fairly limited aim of defending Dewey’s aesthetics against a well-know charge made by Stephen Pepper and Benedetto Croce when Art and Experience was first published. Dewey, they suggested, had produced what purported to be a pragmatist theory of art. But since his theory retained many of the central tenets of idealism, the result was simply inconsistency.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dewey on art as evocative communication.Scott R. Stroud - 2007 - Education and Culture 23 (2):pp. 6-26.
John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience, and Nature. [REVIEW]V. Tejera - 1990 - International Studies in Philosophy 22 (1):81-81.
Art as Experience.Stephen Fredman - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 6 (13):1-12.
Dewey's 'naturalized hegelianism' in operation: Experimental inquiry as self-consciousness.Scott Johnston - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):453-476.
What is a Significant Educational Experience?Geoffrey Hinchliffe - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):417-431.
The Philosopher of the common man.John Dewey (ed.) - 1940 - New York,: Greenwood Press.
Anesthetic experience.Aaron Smuts - 2005 - Philosophy and Literature 29 (1):97-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
48 (#333,173)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references