The hfea public consultation process on hybrids and chimeras: Informed, effective, and meaningful?

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 41-62 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In September 2007, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the United Kingdom concluded that "there is no fundamental reason to prevent cytoplasmic hybrid research . . . this area of research can, with caution and careful scrutiny, be permitted." Later, in January 2008, HFEA issued two research licenses to create humanesque cytoplasmic hybrid embryos from which stem cells could be derived. This article critically examines the public consultation process that preceded these decisions, concluding that the process was flawed and demonstrating how the HFEA documents summarizing the findings of the public consultation process misrepresent the public's contributions to this policymaking initiative.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Balance Between Expertise and Authority in Citizen Engagement About New Biotechnology.David Castle - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):1-13.
Animal eggs for stem cell research: A path not worth taking. Fran - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):18 – 32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-11

Downloads
56 (#291,124)

6 months
7 (#478,520)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Françoise Baylis
Dalhousie University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references