Refractoriness in the reaction times of normals and retardates as a function of response-stimulus interval

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):122 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0024939

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effects of stimulus alternation on sequential information processing by retarded and nonretarded subjects.Edward A. Holden - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):262.
Response strength as a function of changed intertrial interval.Claire B. Ernhart - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (4):208.
Repetition effect as a function of event uncertainty, response-stimulus interval, and rank order of the event.Carlo Umilta, Charles Snyder & Martha Snyder - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):320.
Sequential effects in choice reaction time.Roger W. Schvaneveldt & William G. Chase - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):1.
Dependence of equality judgments upon the temporal interval between stimulus presentations.Wallace R. McAllister, Dorothy E. McAllister & Joseph J. Franchina - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (6):602.
Delay in responding to the first stimulus in the "psychological refractory period" experiment: Comparisons with delay produced by a second stimulus not requiring a response.Louis M. Herman & Michael E. McCauley - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):344.
Joint effects of stimulus intensity and preparatory interval on simple auditory reaction time.Jack Botwinick - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):348.
Unimodal and multimodal sequential information processing in normals and retardates.Edward A. Holden - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):181.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Effects of CS-onset UCS-termination delay, UCS duration, CS-onset UCS-onset interval, and number of CS-UCS pairings on conditioned fear response.Andrew Strouthes - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
10 (#1,220,343)

6 months
5 (#710,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references