On Mendeleev’s predictions: comment on Scerri and Worrall

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):801-812 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.005

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Barnes’s critique of Scerri and Worral.Eric R. Scerri - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):813-816.
What’s Really at Issue with Novel Predictions?Robert G. Hudson - 2007 - Synthese 155 (1):1 - 20.
Prediction and the periodic table.R. E. & J. Worrall - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):407-452.
Reduction in chemistry - a second response to Scerri.Paul Needham - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):317 – 323.
Use-novel predictions and Mendeleev’s periodic table: response to Scerri and Worrall.Samuel Schindler - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):265-269.
Lavoisier and mendeleev on the elements.Robin Findlay Hendry - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 7 (1):31-48.
Mendeleev's discovery of the periodic law: The origin and the reception. [REVIEW]Masanori Kaji - 2003 - Foundations of Chemistry 5 (3):189-214.
Prediction in Selectionist Evolutionary Theory.Rasmus Gr⊘Nfeldt Winther - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):889-901.
Mendeleev, the man and his matrix: Dmitri Mendeleev, aspects of his life and work: was he a somewhat fortunate man? [REVIEW]Gordon T. Woods - 2010 - Foundations of Chemistry 12 (3):171-186.
Do you need to believe in orbitals to use them?: Realism and the autonomy of chemistry.Zack Jenkins - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1052-1062.
The philosophical significance of Mendeleev’s successful predictions of the properties of gallium and scandium.Michael Akeroyd - 2010 - Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2):117-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
50 (#324,011)

6 months
6 (#566,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Barnes
Southern Methodist University

Citations of this work

State of the Field: Why novel prediction matters.Heather Douglas & P. D. Magnus - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):580-589.
Novelty, coherence, and Mendeleev’s periodic table.Samuel Schindler - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:62-69.
A coherentist conception of ad hoc hypotheses.Samuel Schindler - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 67:54-64.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Prediction and the periodic table.Eric R. Scerri & John Worrall - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):407-452.
Prediction, Accommodation, and the Logic of Discovery.Patrick Maher - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:273 - 285.
Bayesianism and support by novel facts.Colin Howson - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):245-251.
Mendeleev's periodic system of chemical elements.Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 1986 - British Journal for the History of Science 19 (1):3-17.

View all 6 references / Add more references