Inconsistent Regulatory Protection under the U.S. Common Rule

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):366-379 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

U.S. regulations do not afford consistent protections to human research subjects. One complaint is that they focus on federally sponsored research, with private research covered only if it falls under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration. This paper examines a deeper problem: Even when the regulations do apply, they still do not afford consistent standards of protection. The U.S. Common Rule and related FDA regulations lack a workable regulatory control mechanism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Exhuming the Body of the Corpus Delicti Rule.Clifton Perry - 2007 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):253-264.
Mortgaging the future: Dumping ethics with nuclear waste.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):518-520.
Are all genes regulatory genes?Rosario Michael Piro - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):595-602.
Institutional hybrids and the rule of law as a regulatory project.Kanishka Jayasuriya - 2012 - In Brian Z. Tamanaha, Caroline Mary Sage & Michael J. V. Woolcock (eds.), Legal pluralism and development: scholars and practitioners in dialogue. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smarter regulations.Victoria Sutton - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):303-309.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
27 (#603,802)

6 months
1 (#1,501,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references