Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Render “Coercion as Subjection” Implausible

, &
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):58-60 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 58-60.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2019.1630512

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Coercion as Subjection and the Institutional Review Board.David B. Resnik - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):56-58.
How Payment For Research Participation Can Be Coercive.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):21-31.
Female Institutional Directors on Boards and Firm Value.María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez, Inmaculada Bel-Oms & Gustau Olcina-Sempere - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 152 (2):343-363.
Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues.Elizabeth A. Buchanan & Charles M. Ess - 2009 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 39 (3):43-49.
Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference. [REVIEW]Francis Rolleston, Jack Corman, Serge Gauthier, Paddi O’Hara & Rod Schmaltz - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):69-73.
Subject subjected - Sexualised coercion, agency and the reorganisation and reformulation of life strategies.Rikke Spjæt Salkvist & Bodil Pedersen - 2008 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 10 (2):70-89.
Coercion, Choice, and Constraint.Jennifer Kemp Hankinson - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Contrasting institutional review boards with institutional ethics committees.Leonard H. Glantz - 1984 - In Ronald E. Cranford & A. Edward Doudera (eds.), Institutional Ethics Committees and Health Care Decision Making. Health Administration Press.
Toward a More Comprehensive Approach to Protecting Human Subjects: The Interface of Data Safety Monitoring Boards and Institutional Review Boards in Randomized Clinical Trials.Valery M. Gordon, Jeremy Sugarman & Nancy Kass - 1998 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 20 (1):1.
The Nature of Political Coercion: An Analysis and Justification.Wei Han - 2004 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
Informal Coercion in the Physical Care of Patients Suffering from Senile Dementia or Mental Retardation.T. Tännsjö - 1999 - Nursing Ethics 6 (4):327-336.
Towards a balanced approach to identifying conflicts of interest faced by institutional review boards.Sharon Kaur & Sujata Balan - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (5):341-361.
Ethics issues with private research ethics boards: A breakout session at the 2009 ncehr national conference.Jack Corman Francis Rolleston, Paddi O'Hara Serge Gauthier & Rod Schmaltz - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics.
Institutional Investors on Boards: Does Their Behavior Influence Corporate Finance?Emma García-Meca, Felix López-Iturriaga & Fernando Tejerina-Gaite - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 146 (2):365-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-17

Downloads
16 (#911,065)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How Payment For Research Participation Can Be Coercive.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):21-31.
Coercion.Alan Wertheimer - 1989 - Ethics 99 (3):642-644.
Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392.

Add more references