Reply to Oaklander

Manuscrito 40 (1):67-73 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT In September, 2016, I replied to an earlier draft of Oaklander’s Critique of my view of time for Manuscrito. Now he has published an extremely complex 50-page expanded version. There is no way that a reply in a journal could cover all the topics Oaklander discusses. So, I will stick mainly to my own view to which Oaklander was responding. My reply is in two parts. In the first, directed at Oaklander’s earlier draft, I say what I want to do in philosophy in general, and in the philosophy of time in particular. In the second part, I mention some places where he misunderstands my view.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1590/0100-6045.2017.v40n1.lb

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A reply to Schlesinger.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (138):93-94.
B-time: a reply to Tallant.L. Nathan Oaklander & V. Alan White - 2007 - Analysis 67 (4):332-340.
Resemblances and universals: A reply to J. Nammour.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1975 - Mind 84 (335):436-439.
The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander.J. D. Kiernan Lewis - 1994 - Philosophy 69:231.
A Reply to Mr. Oaklander.Richard M. Gale - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234.
A reply to Oaklander.Richard M. Gale - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234-238.
The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander.J. D. Kiernan-Lewis - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (268):231 - 233.
The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander.Delmas Kiernan-Lewis - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (268):231-233.
Mctaggart's Paradox and the Infinite Regress of Temporal Attributions: A Reply to Smith.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
Be Careful What You Wish For: A Reply to Craig.L. Nathan Oaklander - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):156-163.
McTaggart’s Paradox and the Infinite Regress of Temporal Attributions.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
A Reply to Johnson's "Review of Saving Belief".Lynne Rudder Baker - 1990 - Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):67 - 68.
C. D. Broad’s Philosophy of Time.L. Nathan Oaklander - 2020 - New York and London: Routledge.
Reply to Van Gulick.Lynne Rudder Baker - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 76 (2-3):217-221.
Reply to Jackson, II.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):196-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-17

Downloads
9 (#1,278,126)

6 months
1 (#1,511,647)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Rudder Baker
PhD: Vanderbilt University; Last affiliation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references