Abstract

The controversial idea of a 'science of human nature' raises serious issues in philosophy and philosophical psychology. The questions arising in this respect involve the gradual and ordinarily unnoticed transformations of our beliefs about the reality of human beings among the educated people. The employment of scientific technique in almost every phase of human life has somehow given rise to a dehumanisation of the human. In so far as we are impressed by the successful scientific experiments, we ignore this dehumanism. Consequently, we are willing to allow science to reduce our own human status to that of a biological organism with a complex nervous system and brain. Now it is no more simply a theoretical question about our own reality because there are cases of actual manipulation of human body on behalf of the unquestioned assumptions about the organismic nature of human beings. Genetic engineering and neurophysiology are two fields of inquiry mostly active in this direction. This article is an attempt to point out a most serious philosophical issue arising out of this. This issue is that the scientist takes human thought and consciousness, which are the most valuable, unique and distinctive human characterisation, as secondary and insignificant aspect compared with the biological and physiological processes. Thought is considered as an after effect of neurophysiological processes of brain. Now this is an unjustifiable assumption which cannot in any way be verified. The reasons for the impossibility of reduction of thought and consciousness to neurological level are offered by many quarters. Some of the most important reasons are discussed in this paper.