Religious Commitment and the Logical Status of Doctrines: WILLIAM H. AUSTIN

Religious Studies 9 (1):39-48 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The great Falsification Debate about the logical status of religious beliefs seems fairly quiescent at present. Most philosophers of religion have opted for one or the other of two opposite responses to the falsificationists' challenge

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Austin and perception.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.
Courage, Caution and Heaven’s Gate.Guy Axtell - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 4:77-89.
Bigotry and Religious Belief.William M. Ramsey - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):125-151.
Oppositions of Religious Doctrines.William A. Christian - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (1):122-124.
The logical status of 'exists'.William R. Stirton - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:37-50.
Peirce and the logical status of diagrams.Sun-joo Shin - 1994 - History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):45-68.
Locating the causes of religious commitment.Harvey Whitehouse - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):752-753.
Falsification and Belief: SCHUBERT M. OGDEN.Schubert M. Ogden - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (1):21-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
44 (#362,335)

6 months
12 (#216,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references