Arguments for the Continuity Principle

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):329 - 347 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are two principles that lend Brouwer's mathematics the extra power beyond arithmetic. Both are presented in Brouwer's writings with little or no argument. One, the principle of bar induction, will not concern us here. The other, the continuity principle for numbers, occurs for the first time in print in [4]. It is formulated and immediately applied to show that the set of numerical choice sequences is not enumerable. In fact, the idea of the continuity property can be dated fairly precisely, it is to be found in the margin of Brouwer's notes for his course on Pointset Theory of 1915/16. The course was repeated in 1916/17 and he must have inserted his first formulation of the continuity principle in the fall of 1916 as new material right at the beginning of the course.In modern language, the principle readswhere α and β range over choice sequences of natural numbers, m and x over natural numbers, and stands for ⟨α, α, …, α⟩, the initial segment of α of length m.An immediate consequence of WC-N is that all full functions are continuous, and, as a corollary, that the continuum is unsplittable [28]. Note that WC-N is incompatible with Church's thesis, [22], section 4.6.After Brouwer asserted WC-N, Troelstra was the first to ask in print for a conceptual motivation, but he remained an exception; most authors followed Brouwer by simply asserting it, cf. [18].Let us note first that in one particular case the principle is obvious indeed, namely in the case of the lawless sequences. The notion of lawless sequence surfaced fairly late in the history of intuitionism. Kreisel introduced it in [17] for metamathematical purposes. There is a letter from Brouwer to Heyting in which the phenomenon also occurs [7]. This is an important and interesting fact since it is the only time that Brouwer made use of a possibility expressly stipulated in, e.g., [5], see below.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arguments for the continuity principle.Mark van Atten & Dirk van Dalen - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):329-347.
The principle of continuity and Leibniz's theory of consciousness.Larry M. Jorgensen - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 223-248.
Self-Respect Regained.Jake Chandler & Adam Rieger - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (2pt2):311-318.
Self-supporting arguments.Andrew D. Cling - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):279–303.
The Leibniz continuity condition, inconsistency and quantum dynamics.Chris Mortensen - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):377-389.
Value and unacceptable risk.Gustaf Arrhenius & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (2):177-197.
Problems with principle P.Hugh Clapin - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):261-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
24 (#662,338)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dirk Van Dalen
Utrecht University

Citations of this work

A Note on Neat Reducts.Tarek Sayed Ahmed - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (2):139-151.

Add more citations