- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of Barrotta & Dascal (2005): Controversies and Subjectivity [Book Review]
Pragmatics and Cognition 16 (1):193-196 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Controversies on, in, Around, and About the Subject: Barrotta P. & Dascal M. : Controversies and Subjectivity. Italian Culture Institute in London, University of Pisa/tel Aviv University Controversies 1, 2005. x, 411 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 1881 0/eur 125.00, ISBN 978 1 58811 615 4/usd 169.00.Gabor A. Zemplen - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):115-121.
Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory' by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW]Maria Navarro - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
Marcelo Dascal’s Theory of Controversies.Aviram Sariel - 2016 - Latest Issue of Pragmatics Cognition 23 (3):437-460.
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of Dascal's view of scientific controversies.Kanavillil Rajagopalan - 2002 - Manuscrito 25 (2):433-464.
Leibniz's conciliatory approaches in scientific controversies.Marcelo Dascal & Erez Firt - 2010 - In The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. John Benjamins. pp. 7--137.
Review of Dascal (2010): The Practice of Reason. Leibniz and his Controversies. [REVIEW]Txetxu Ausin - 2011 - Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (1):154-158.
The Case of Joseph Priestley.Pierluigi Barrotta - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 153.
Analytic Controversies.Aviram Sariel - 2016 - In Giovanni Scarafile & Leah Gruenpeter Gold (eds.), Paradoxes of Conflict. Cham: Springer.
Scientific dialectics in action: The case of Joseph Priestley.Pierluigi Barrotta - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 153--176.
Parsons on Mises and Kant: A Comment.Pierluigi Barrotta - 1998 - Economics and Philosophy 14 (1):127-130.
Controversies in the Scientific Revolution.Victor Boantza Marcelo Dascal (ed.) - 2011 - John Benjamins.
The Art of Controversies.G. W. Leibniz, Marcelo Dascal, Quintin Racionero & Adelino Cardoso - 2006 - Studia Leibnitiana 38 (2):242-244.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-18
Downloads
70 (#235,820)
6 months
2 (#1,206,545)
2014-01-18
Downloads
70 (#235,820)
6 months
2 (#1,206,545)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo