Kant on Human Nature and Radical Evil

Philosophy and Theology 19 (1-2):215-224 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are human beings essentially good or evil? Immanuel Kant responds, “[H]e [man] is as much the one as the other, partly good, partly bad.” Given this, I’d like to explore the following: What does Kant mean by human nature and how is it possible to be both good and evil? What is “original sin” and does it place limits on free will? In what respect might Kant’s views be significant for non-believers? More specifically, is Kant saying that human beings need God in order to be good or is morality possible without faith?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant on the radical evil of human nature.Paul Formosa - 2007 - Philosophical Forum 38 (3):221–245.
The Role of Evil in Kant's Liberalism.David James - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (3):238-261.
Kant on the Limits of Human Evil.Paul Formosa - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:189-214.
Moral Evil, Freedom and the Goodness of God: Why Kant Abandoned Theodicy.Sam Duncan - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):973-991.
Atheism, Radical Evil, and Kant.Dennis Vanden Auweele - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1-2):155-176.
What is so good about moral freedom?Wes Morriston - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):344-358.
A philosophy of evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Champaign, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
122 (#147,710)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Camille Atkinson
Coastal Bend College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references